Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BackgroundFormaldehyde can be toxic, allergenic and carcinogenic. Evaporation of formaldehyde from formalin-treated cadavers in the anatomy dissection rooms can produce high exposure. This study was conducted to assess acute and chronic toxic effects of formalin-treated cadavers on medical students, staff members, and workers at the Anatomy department in the Alexandria Faculty of Medicine (AFM).MethodsA cross sectional approach was adopted to investigate medical students (n = 454). Staff members and workers at the Anatomy department (n = 16), and unexposed staff members and workers in the AFM (n = 19) were included in the study. Medical students filled self-administered predesigned questionnaire. Formalin-exposed and unexposed staff members filled a questionnaire and a Complete Blood Count was done for them.ResultsThe most frequently reported symptoms by medical students were unpleasant smell (91.2%), itching in the eyes (81.3%), and excessive lacrimation (76.1%). Majority of them reported duration of relief within one hour (>80%), and more than two thirds reported wearing laboratory coats and hand gloves. Formalin-exposed staff reported symptoms of skin disorders as drying (75%), eczema (68.8%), and allergic contact dermatitis (87.5%), besides, eye irritation (68.8%), respiratory tract irritation (93.8%), and work-related bronchial asthma (53.3%). The mean RBCs and platelets counts were significantly lower among formalin-exposed staff (4.08 ± 0.65 × 106/ul and 237,375 ± 71745.73/ul respectively) compared with unexposed staff (4.95 ± 0.50 × 106/ul and 280473.68 ± 54456.27/ul respectively). WBCs count was abnormal (low or high) among formalin-exposed staff members (6.2%, and 18.8% respectively), while all unexposed staff had normal WBCs counts.ConclusionThe research highlighted the irritating action of formalin on medical students, and chronic toxic effects on staff members. This necessitates re-evaluation of the concentration of formalin, proper ventilation and assessment of working practices in the dissecting rooms at the Anatomy department.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elshaer et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: