Key result
Preterm birth with extremely low birth weight was associated with significantly higher epicardial fat thickness compared to healthy peers (8.7±0.7 mm vs. 5.6±0.9 mm; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does a history of extremely low birth weight increase epicardial fat thickness in young adults compared to healthy peers?
Case-Control (n=60)
Does a history of extremely low birth weight increase epicardial fat thickness in young adults compared to healthy peers?
Epicardial fat thickness is significantly increased in young adults born extremely preterm and correlates with increased left ventricular mass, suggesting its potential as an early marker for future cardiovascular risk in this population.
May flag early CV risk in preterm-born adults; hypothesis-generating for prognostic utility and needs prospective validation.
Preterm birth and epicardial fat thickness (EFT) constitute novel risk factors for the onset of future adverse cardiovascular events. In total, 30 ex-extremely low birth weight (ex-ELBW) subjects (10 males, 20 females, aged 17-28) were enrolled and compared with 30 healthy peers. EFT was significantly higher (8.7±0.7 mm v. 5.6±0.9 mm; P<0.001) in ex-ELBW than in controls and was correlated with birth weight (r=-0.47, P=0.0009), gestational age (r=-0.39, P=0.03) and cardiac left ventricular mass (r=0.51, P=0.004). When excluding the influence of body mass index, birth weight was the sole remaining determinant of EFT, irrespective of gestational age (r=-0.37, P=0.04). The same findings when excluding the possible influence of blood pressure values on the cardiac structures (r=-0.40, P=0.028). In conclusion, EFT is significantly higher in former preterm subjects and is likewise associated with an increase in left ventricular mass. In view of the acknowledged correlation between the latter and an increased incidence of cardiovascular diseases, EFT appears to be an easy-to-measure tool capable of predicting the likely development of future adverse cardiovascular events in these subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bassareo et al. (2016) conducted a case-control in Extremely low birth weight (preterm birth) (n=60). Extremely low birth weight (ex-ELBW) vs. Healthy peers was evaluated on Epicardial fat thickness (EFT) (p=<0.001). Preterm birth with extremely low birth weight was associated with significantly higher epicardial fat thickness compared to healthy peers (8.7±0.7 mm vs. 5.6±0.9 mm; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: