Why the study?
Is epicardial fat thickness ≥ 5 mm associated with adverse echocardiographic changes and cardiac risk factors in patients undergoing echocardiography?
Is epicardial fat thickness ≥ 5 mm associated with adverse echocardiographic changes and cardiac risk factors in patients undergoing echocardiography?
Echocardiographic epicardial fat >5 mm is a simple, inexpensive marker associated with adverse cardiac structural and functional abnormalities.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support epicardial fat as an echo risk marker; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: The association between visceral obesity and cardiovascular risk has been well described. Some studies show a proportional relationship between the presence of visceral obesity and epicardial fat. Measuring the amount of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) can be a novel parameter that is inexpensive and easy to obtain and may be helpful in cardiovascular risk stratification. However, the relationship between epicardial fat and cardiac function and that between epicardial fat and cardiac risk factors is less well described. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between echocardiographic epicardial fat and the morphologic and physiologic changes observed at echocardiography and to evaluate the association between epicardial fat and cardiac risk factors. A cross-sectional study of 97 echocardiographic studies (females, n = 42) was conducted. Two groups were identified: epicardial fat ≥ 5 mm (group I) and <5 mm (group II). RESULTS: Epicardial fat >5 mm was associated with LA enlargement, with lower ejection fraction, increased left ventricular mass, and abnormal diastolic function. On a multivariable regression analysis, all these parameters also correlated individually with EAT thickness independent of age. Hyperglycemia (DM), systolic hypertension, and lipid parameters for metabolic syndrome showed a trend for positive association, but this was not statistically significant. The association was not significant even for higher cutoff limits of EAT thickness. CONCLUSION: Epicardial fat >5 mm is associated with cardiac abnormalities on echocardiography. This is a sensitive assessment of body fat distribution, is easily available at echocardiography, and is simple to acquire at no added cost. Further studies looking at the appropriate cut-off thickness of EAT and the sites of measurement to be used are needed. Comparison of this simple and inexpensive measure with other measures of obesity, such as waist-hip ratio, body mass index, Dexa scan of visceral fat, and magnetic resonance imaging of visceral, are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goel et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: