Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
While large language models (LLMs) hold promise for transforming clinical healthcare, current comparisons and benchmark evaluations of large language models in medicine often fail to capture real-world efficacy. Specifically, we highlight how key discrepancies arising from choices of data, tasks, and metrics can limit meaningful assessment of translational impact and cause misleading conclusions. Therefore, we advocate for rigorous, context-aware evaluations and experimental transparency across both research and deployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agrawal et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: