Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that lower facial height has no influence on frontal facial attractiveness and treatment need perception of lay people. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Frontal facial silhouettes of a man and a woman with normal lower facial height values (male: 81.5 mm; female: 70.5 mm) were modified by increasing and decreasing their lower facial heights in steps of 1 mm to obtain frontal images with different lower facial height alterations ranging from +6 mm to -6 mm for each sex. A panel of 100 lay people scored each silhouette's attractiveness on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) and also indicated whether they would seek treatment if the image represented their own. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the VAS scores. RESULTS: Unaltered +/-1-mm and +/-2-mm silhouettes got the highest VAS scores. Scores were significantly lower (P < or = .001) as the divergence from the normal value exceeded 2 mm. Beyond +3 mm and -4 mm in females and +4 mm and -3 mm in males the difference between the scores became statistically insignificant. At +/-4 mm, more than 75% of the raters elected to have treatment. CONCLUSION: The hypothesis was rejected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Varlık et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: