Why the study?
While continuity in primary care improves outcomes, less information exists regarding the association of inpatient continuity of care with hospital complications and length of stay.
Does receiving care from multiple hospitalists increase hospital complications and length of stay in hospitalized Medicare enrollees?
Cohort (n=617,680)
Does receiving care from multiple hospitalists increase hospital complications and length of stay in hospitalized Medicare enrollees?
Receiving care from multiple hospitalists during the first 3 days of admission is not associated with worse length of stay or ICU transfers, though there is a marginal increase in drug toxic effects.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multiple hospitalists early may slightly raise drug toxicity risk; leaves open whether continuity affects complications in observational data.
Importance: Continuity in primary care is associated with improved outcomes, but less information is available on the association of continuity of care in the hospital with hospital complications. Objective: To assess whether the number of hospitalists providing care is associated with subsequent hospital complications and length of stay. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used multilevel logistic regression models to analyze Medicare claims for medical admissions from 2016 to 2018 with a length of stay longer than 4 days. Admissions with multiple charges on the same day from a hospitalist or an intensive care unit (ICU) stay during hospital days 1 to 3 were excluded. The data were accessed and analyzed from November 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021. Exposures: The number of different hospitalists who submitted charges during hospital days 1 to 3. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall length of stay and transfer to ICU or a new diagnosis of drug toxic effects on hospital day 4 or later. Results: Among the 617 680 admissions, 362 376 (58.7%) were women, with a mean (SD) age of 80.2 (8.4) years. In 306 037 admissions (49.6%), the same hospitalist provided care on days 1 to 3, while 2 hospitalists provided care in 274 658 admissions (44.5%), and 3 hospitalists provided care in 36 985 admissions (6.0%). There was no significant association between the number of different hospitalists on days 1 to 3 and either length of stay or subsequent ICU transfers. Admissions seeing 2 or 3 hospitalists had a slightly greater adjusted odds of subsequent new diagnoses of drug toxic effects (2 hospitalists: odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07; 3 hospitalists: OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.12). Conclusions and Relevance: There was little evidence that receiving care from multiple hospitalists was associated with worse outcomes for patients receiving all their general medical care from hospitalists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goodwin et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Medical admissions (n=617,680). Care from multiple (2 or 3) different hospitalists vs. Care from a single hospitalist was evaluated on Overall length of stay and transfer to ICU or a new diagnosis of drug toxic effects on hospital day 4 or later (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: