Key result
An ERAS protocol reduced the length of hospital stay compared to non-ERAS care in patients undergoing DIEP-flap breast reconstruction.
Why the study?
Enhanced recovery after surgery is established for autologous breast reconstruction, but treatment regimens between centers with and without an established protocol needed comparison.
Does an ERAS protocol reduce length of hospital stay in patients undergoing DIEP-flap breast reconstruction?
Case-Control (n=79)
Yes
Does an ERAS protocol reduce length of hospital stay in patients undergoing DIEP-flap breast reconstruction?
Implementation of an ERAS protocol in DIEP-flap breast reconstruction significantly reduces length of hospital stay without increasing complications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ERAS associated with shorter LOS after DIEP reconstruction; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is established for autologous breast reconstruction. ERAS leads to a shortened hospital stay and improved outcome after elective surgery. In this retrospective, two-center case−control study, we compared two different treatment regimens for patients undergoing a DIEP-flap breast reconstruction from two centers, one with an established ERAS protocol and one without. All patients with DIEP breast reconstructions over the period of 12 months were included. The primary outcome measure was the length of hospital stay (LOS) in days. A total of 79 patients with 95 DIEP-flaps were analyzed. In group A (ERAS) 42 patients were operated with DIEP flaps, in group B (non-ERAS) 37 patients. LOS was significantly reduced in the ERAS group (4.51 days) compared to the non-ERAS group (6.32; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that, in group A, LOS is significantly affected by surgery duration. BMI in the ERAS group had no effect on LOS. In group B a higher BMI resulted in a significantly higher LOS. In multivariate analysis, neither age nor type for surgery (primary/secondary/after neoadjuvant therapy, etc.) affected LOS. In both groups, no systemic or flap-related complications were observed. Comparing two reconstructive centers with and without implemented ERAS, ERAS led to a significantly decreased LOS for all patients. ERAS implementation does not result in an increased complication rate or flap loss. Postoperative pain can be well managed with basic analgesia using NSAID when intraoperative blocks are applied. The reduced use of opioids was well tolerated. With implementation of ERAS the recovery experience can be enhanced making autologous breast reconstructions more available and attractive for various patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Linder et al. (2022) conducted a case-control in DIEP-flap breast reconstruction (n=79). Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol vs. non-ERAS protocol was evaluated on length of hospital stay (LOS) in days (p=< 0.001). An ERAS protocol reduced the length of hospital stay compared to non-ERAS care in patients undergoing DIEP-flap breast reconstruction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: