Key result
Laparoscopic right salpingectomy successfully treats isolated fallopian tube torsion while preserving the ovary.
Why the study?
Isolated fallopian tube torsion is a rare cause of acute lower abdominal pain in women, and its nonspecific clinical presentation makes preoperative diagnosis challenging.
Case Report (n=1)
Isolated fallopian tube torsion is a rare cause of acute lower abdominal pain that requires early diagnosis and timely management for tubal sparing surgery.
Supports prompt laparoscopy for suspected isolated tubal torsion; single case leaves optimal management open.
Isolated fallopian tube torsion (IFTT) is a rare cause of acute lower abdominal pain in women. Its nonspecific clinical presentation makes preoperative diagnosis more challenging. Laparoscopy is the gold standard in diagnosis and treatment. This is a case of a 25-year-old newly married patient presented to the emergency department with sever acute lower abdominal pain associated with nausea. Clinical physical examination revealed abdominal tenderness. Ultrasound showed a right ovarian cyst measuring 4.5 cm × 4.1 cm with mural nodule, no internal vascularity on color doppler. Laparoscopy was performed where the right fallopian tube was found edematous, darkened red in color. Therefore, isolated fallopian tube torsion was diagnosed and right salpingectomy was performed with preservation of the right ovary. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. Histopathological examination confirmed necrosis of the excised fallopian tube. Isolated fallopian tube torsion is a rare yet noteworthy event. Early diagnosis and timely management are crucial for tubal sparing surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almandeel et al. (2023) conducted a case report in Isolated fallopian tube torsion (n=1). Laparoscopy and right salpingectomy was evaluated. Laparoscopy and right salpingectomy with preservation of the right ovary successfully treated a 25-year-old woman presenting with isolated fallopian tube torsion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: