Key result
Following blood pressure-induced myogenic constriction, consecutive arteriolar flicker light-induced dilatation was significantly higher in healthy active individuals (4.1%) compared to sedentary cardiovascular risk patients (1.6%).
Why the study?
Flicker-light induced retinal vessel dilatation is blunted in both sedentary cardiovascular risk patients and healthy physically active individuals, prompting the need to quantify retinal myogenic responses to blood pressure peaks to differentiate microvascular health.
Does retinal myogenic constriction in response to blood pressure peaks differentiate microvascular health between healthy active individuals and sedentary cardiovascular risk patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=18)
No
Does retinal myogenic constriction in response to blood pressure peaks differentiate microvascular health between healthy active individuals and sedentary cardiovascular risk patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.1% vs 1.6%
p-value: p=< 0.01
Assessment of retinal myogenic constriction following blood pressure peaks helps differentiate true endothelial dysfunction in sedentary risk patients from physiological blunting in healthy active individuals.
Background/Aims Flicker-light induced retinal vessel dilatation (FID), a marker of microvascular endothelial function, has been shown to be blunted in sedentary cardiovascular risk patients (SR) as well as healthy physically active individuals (HA). This study aimed to quantify the retinal myogenic response to blood pressure (BP) peaks and its effects on consecutive FID for differentiation of microvascular health. Methods Ten HA and eleven SR with a previously established restriction of arteriolar FID (aFID) (<2.2%) were invited in order to assess BP-induced myogenic constriction following a standardized handgrip task and a consecutive FID. BP was measured beat-to-beat. Results The complete dataset of nine HA (3 female, mean age 65 years) and nine SR (5 female, mean age 61 years) individuals was analyzed. The central retinal arteriolar diameter equivalent (CRAE) was 183 ± 11 μm for HA and 176 ± 20 μm for SR. Initial baseline aFID was 1.6 ± 0.4% in HA and 1.6 ± 0.7% in SR. Systolic ( p = 0.334) and diastolic ( p = 0.245) BP increase following the handgrip task was in the range of 20–30% and comparable in both groups. BP increase was followed by a significantly higher arteriolar (−2.9 ± 1.3% vs. −1.3 ± 0.6%, p < 0.01) myogenic constriction in HA compared to SR. Moreover, in the consecutive assessment of FID directly after the BP-induced vessel constriction, aFID (4.1 ± 2.0% vs. 1.6 ± 0.9%, p < 0.01) was higher in HA compared to SR. Conclusion Initial baseline aFID was blunted in HA and SR. Retinal myogenic constriction was impaired in SR compared to HA. The consecutive aFID after BP-induced myogenic constriction recovered in HA but remained blunted in SR. Additional assessment of retinal myogenic constriction needs to be considered to improve CV risk stratification and reduce false-positive findings of endothelial dysfunction in otherwise healthy active individuals. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03986892 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03986892 ).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Streese et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Blunted arteriolar flicker light-induced dilatation (cardiovascular risk) (n=18). Healthy active status vs. Sedentary at risk (SR) individuals was evaluated on Consecutive arteriolar flicker light-induced dilatation (aFID) after blood pressure-induced vessel constriction (p=< 0.01). Following blood pressure-induced myogenic constriction, consecutive arteriolar flicker light-induced dilatation was significantly higher in healthy active individuals (4.1%) compared to sedentary cardiovascular risk patients (1.6%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: