Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Subseasonal forecasts provide valuable guidance for decision-making but remain limited by systematic biases and coarse spatial resolution, particularly over regions with complex orography. Quantile mapping (QM) is widely used for post-processing because it enables effective bias correction and downscaling, yet it applies a distributional correction and therefore neglects the case-specific dependence between forecasts and observations. To move toward a more integrated approach, we explore a diffusion-based generative framework for simultaneous probabilistic bias correction and high-resolution downscaling, with lead time explicitly included as a conditioning variable. We employ a conditional denoising diffusion model (DM) trained on high-resolution gridded observations (2 km) and conditioned on coarse-resolution ensemble-mean subseasonal forecasts (36 km) from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) subseasonal system. We focus here on a univariate temperature model and on training strategies. By learning conditional distributions of observations given forecasts and lead time, diffusion-based generative models enable case-dependent corrections that exploit forecast–observation relationships. Two training configurations are examined to assess how lead-time conditioning and data availability influence the learning of biases. Results show that the DM recovers realistic fine-scale temperature patterns and achieves meaningful lead-time-dependent bias correction across subseasonal lead times, even when trained on relatively limited datasets. However, compared to QM, the diffusion-based forecasts exhibit lower skill in probabilistic metrics such as the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) and discrimination for extremes. Overall, this work represents a first step toward lead-time-aware subseasonal post-processing using DMs and highlights directions for future methodological development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pyrina et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: