Key result
ESC 0/3-hour algorithm resolves the observe zone but shows ~17-point lower NSTEMI sensitivity vs APACE.
Why the study?
Evidence on extended troponin testing times and their impact on diagnostic accuracy and outcomes remains sparse for patients in the ESC 0/1-hour algorithm's observe zone.
Does the ESC 0/3-hour algorithm improve triage effectiveness and diagnostic resolution of the observe zone compared to APACE criteria in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome?
Observational (n=4,605)
No
Does the ESC 0/3-hour algorithm improve triage effectiveness and diagnostic resolution of the observe zone compared to APACE criteria in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome?
The ESC 0/3-hour algorithm effectively eliminates the 'observe zone' in suspected acute coronary syndrome, and flexibly extending troponin measurement intervals beyond 3 hours is safe and highly practical for real-world emergency departments.
May support ESC 0/3-hour use to resolve observe zone in suspected NSTEMI; leaves open sensitivity trade-offs versus APACE in observational cohorts.
BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin tests have enhanced early myocardial infarction diagnosis, yet many patients still land in the observe zone (OZ). Guidelines suggest a 3-hour troponin measurement for those in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1 hour-algorithm's OZ, but evidence on extended troponin testing times and their impact on diagnostic accuracy and outcomes remains sparse. METHODS: Patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome were consecutively enrolled in a single-centre observational study. The triage protocol allowed an optional third troponin measurement at 3 hours or later to evaluate the performance and safety of two validated triage algorithms used to resolve the OZ. RESULTS: Of the 4605 patients, 948 were triaged to the OZ (20.6%). The prevalence of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) within the OZ was 7.2%. 212 patients (22.3% of OZ patients) had a third troponin measurement and were included in the comparative analysis. For diagnosing NSTEMI, the ESC 0/3-hour criteria showed lower sensitivity (69.4%) than the criteria defined in the Advantageous Predictors of Acute Coronary Syndromes Evaluation (APACE) study (86.1%, p=0.053), with both having high negative predictive value (93.5% vs 87.5%, p=0.339). By definition, the ESC 0/3-hour algorithm categorises all patients into rule-in or rule-out, eliminating the need for an OZ, whereas 55.6% of patients remained in the OZ with the APACE criteria. Mortality rates in the OZ were similar across different timing protocols, with 30-day rates of 0.78% for third blood draws within 210 min (n=128) and 1.19% for those over 210 min (n=84); 3-year rates were 5.51% and 4.82%, confirming the safety of extended sampling. CONCLUSIONS: Although the ESC 0/3-hour criteria have a lower sensitivity than the APACE criteria, it is by definition more effective because it does not leave patients in the OZ. Extending the timing for the third troponin measurement beyond 3 hours proves to be effective and safe, supporting its implementation in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03111862.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reich et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Suspected acute coronary syndrome with indeterminate initial triage (observe zone) (n=4,605). ESC 0/3-hour algorithm (including extended sampling times) vs. APACE criteria was evaluated on Sensitivity for diagnosing NSTEMI (95% CI 0.531-0.820, p=0.053). The ESC 0/3-hour algorithm completely resolved the observe zone for all unclassified patients, although it demonstrated lower NSTEMI sensitivity (69.4% vs 86.1%, p=0.053) than the APACE criteria.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: