Key result
A rural hospital quality collaborative did not significantly improve heart failure core measures, whereas higher nurse-turnover was associated with lower compliance across all 4 measures.
Why the study?
Does a quality collaborative improve adherence to 4 heart failure core measures in rural hospitals?
RCT (n=591)
Cluster-randomized
Yes
Does a quality collaborative improve adherence to 4 heart failure core measures in rural hospitals?
A quality collaborative intervention did not significantly improve heart failure core measures in rural hospitals, though stable nurse staffing was associated with better care quality.
Quality collaboratives failed to improve rural HF core measures; challenges their adoption while extending evidence on nurse turnover's negative association.
BACKGROUND: Use of evidence-based practices for heart failure (HF) patients has the potential to improve outcomes and reduce variations in care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of a rural hospital quality collaborative and organizational context (nurse staffing and practice environment) on 4 HF core measures. RESEARCH DESIGN: Phased cluster-randomized trial with delayed intervention control group. The intervention included a HF toolkit, 2 onsite meetings, and a monthly phone call. SUBJECTS: Twenty-three rural eastern US hospitals, registered nurses who care for HF patients (N=591). MEASURES: Seven quarters of 4 HF core measures, nurse staffing (nursing skill mix, registered nurse hours per patient day, nurse-turnover), and a survey of practice environment. RESULTS: : Using regression models with generalized estimating equation autoregressive methods, no statistically significant changes were found during the intervention period on all 4 core measures for either group. Higher nurse-turnover was related to all 4 core measures: lower compliance with discharge instructions [β=-1.042; 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.777, -0.307], smoking cessation (β=-1.148; 95% CI: -2.180, -0.117), left ventricular ejection fraction (β=-0.893; 95% CI: -1.784, -0.002), and prescribing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors on discharge (β=-1.044; 95% CI: -1.820, -0.269). Better practice environment was related to higher left ventricular ejection fraction (β=0.217; 95% CI: 0.054, 0.379). CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in 4 core measures were realized in stable environments (less nurse-turnover). Assuring appropriate nurse staffing and stability is essential to increase organizational preparation for quality initiatives and adoption of best practices in HF care in rural hospitals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Newhouse et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Heart failure (n=591). Quality collaborative (HF toolkit, onsite meetings, monthly phone call) vs. Delayed intervention control was evaluated on 4 heart failure core measures. A rural hospital quality collaborative did not significantly improve heart failure core measures, whereas higher nurse-turnover was associated with lower compliance across all 4 measures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: