Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 1, 1982American Journal of Roentgenology

Fetal biparietal diameter: rational choice of plane of section for sonographic measurement

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

FHF P HadlockBaylor College of MedicineRDRL DeterRHR B HarristBeijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Hadlock et al. (1982) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5e87dffae4f7393b8ed8a2https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.138.5.871
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fetal head and abdominal circumferences: I. Evaluation of measurement errors1982 · 47 citations
  2. 2Estimating fetal age: effect of head shape on BPD1981 · 159 citations
  3. 3ULTRASOUND MEASUREMENT OF THE FETAL HEAD TO ABDOMEN CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO IN THE ASSESSMENT OF GROWTH RETARDATION1977 · 489 citations
  4. 4Analysis of biparietal diameter as an accurate indicator of gestational age1980 · 120 citations