Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper develops a model of business cycles with endogenous volatility at the zero lower bound (ZLB) and central-bank forward guidance. We deliver three main results. First, a credible commitment to future stabilization curbs excess volatility at the ZLB. Second, pledging not to stabilize later can shift the economy onto more favorable equilibrium paths, exposing a trade-off between future stabilization and reduced aggregate volatility at the ZLB. Third, keeping the timing of future stabilization uncertain strictly dominates other forward-guidance strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carreras et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: