Key result
A body-worn sensor system utilizing both accelerometry and gyroscopy data with a machine learning algorithm achieved an overall exercise repetition counting accuracy of 95.6% compared to manual counting.
Why the study?
Studies on optimal rehabilitation exercise dose and timing post-stroke have been limited by the challenge of quantifying exercise activities over multiple days.
Can body-worn sensors and machine learning accurately identify and count upper extremity rehabilitation exercise repetitions in patients with recent stroke and healthy controls?
Observational (n=26)
No
Can body-worn sensors and machine learning accurately identify and count upper extremity rehabilitation exercise repetitions in patients with recent stroke and healthy controls?
Body-worn sensor systems combined with machine learning can accurately identify and count upper extremity rehabilitation exercises in post-stroke patients, demonstrating feasibility for tracking exercise dose.
May enable objective exercise tracking in rehab; leaves open larger outcome validation trials.
Background: Prior studies suggest that participation in rehabilitation exercises improves motor function post-stroke; however, studies on optimal exercise dose and timing have been limited by the technical challenge of quantifying exercise activities over multiple days. Objective: In this exploratory study, we assessed the feasibility of using body-worn sensors to track rehabilitation exercises in the inpatient setting and investigated which recording parameters and data analysis strategies are sufficient for accurately identifying and counting exercise repetitions. Methods: MC10 BioStampRC® sensors were used to measure accelerometry and gyroscopy data from arms of healthy controls (n=13) and patients with upper extremity (UE) weakness due to recent stroke (n=13) while the subjects performed three pre-selected UE exercises. Sensor data was then labeled by exercise type, and this labeled data set was used to train a machine learning classification algorithm for identifying exercise type. The machine-learning algorithm and a peak-finding algorithm were used to count exercise repetitions in non-labeled data sets. Results: We achieved a repetition counting accuracy of 95.6 ± 2.4 % overall, and 95.0 ± 2.3 % in patients with UE weakness due to stroke. Accuracy was decreased when using fewer sensors or using accelerometry data alone. Conclusions: Our exploratory study suggests that body-worn sensor systems are technically feasible, well-tolerated in subjects with recent stroke, and may ultimately be useful for developing a system to measure total exercise “dose” in post-stroke patients during clinical rehabilitation or clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balestra et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Upper extremity weakness due to recent stroke (n=26). Body-worn sensors (accelerometry and gyroscopy) with machine learning vs. Manual repetition counting was evaluated on Repetition counting accuracy. A body-worn sensor system utilizing both accelerometry and gyroscopy data with a machine learning algorithm achieved an overall exercise repetition counting accuracy of 95.6% compared to manual counting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: