Key result
Intravenous flecainide increased CFE-mean values (132.3 vs 111.5 ms, p<0.001) and decreased CFE area by 32.9% while preserving spatial localization in patients with non-paroxysmal AF.
Why the study?
Does intravenous flecainide alter the extension and localization of complex fractionated electrogram areas in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Does intravenous flecainide alter the extension and localization of complex fractionated electrogram areas in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 132.3% vs 111.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
Intravenous flecainide reduces the extension of CFE areas while preserving their spatial localization, suggesting a CFE-mean value <80 ms may help define stable CFE areas for ablation.
Flecainide-associated CFE reduction should not yet guide ablation; hypothesis-generating for substrate modification in non-paroxysmal AF.
AIMS: Complex fractionated electrogram (CFE) ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation is an accepted strategy for the treatment of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to determine the effect of flecainide on the distribution and extension of CFE areas. METHODS: Twenty-three non-paroxysmal AF patients were enrolled in this prospective study. A first CFE map was obtained under baseline conditions by sampling 5 s of continuous recording from the distal electrodes of the ablation catheter. Intravenous flecainide (1 mg/kg) was administered over 10 min and followed by 30-min observation time. A second CFE map was obtained with the same modalities. CFE-mean values, CFE areas, and atrial electrogram amplitude were retrieved from the electro-anatomical mapping system (Ensite NavX). RESULTS: After flecainide administration, CFE-mean values increased (111.5 ± 55.3 vs. 132.3 ± 65.0 ms, p < 0.001) with a decrease of CFE area (32.9%) in all patients. Atrial electrogram amplitude decreased significantly (0.30 ± 0.31 vs. 0.25 ± 0.20 mV, p < 0.001). We observed 80.9% preservation of CFE areas. A CFE mean of 78 ms was the best cutoff for predicting stable CFE areas. CONCLUSIONS: Flecainide reduces the extension of CFE areas while preserving their spatial localization. A CFE-mean value <80 ms may be crucial to define and locate stable CFE areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bortoli et al. (2015) studied non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=23). Intravenous flecainide vs. Baseline conditions was evaluated on CFE-mean values (p=<0.001). Intravenous flecainide increased CFE-mean values (132.3 vs 111.5 ms, p<0.001) and decreased CFE area by 32.9% while preserving spatial localization in patients with non-paroxysmal AF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: