Key result
Adherence to ESC hospitalization guidelines for acute pericarditis did not significantly change the primary composite outcome compared to non-adherence (27.5% vs. 24.3%, p=0.707).
Why the study?
To evaluate the adequacy of European Society of Cardiology guideline hospitalization criteria in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute pericarditis.
Does respecting ESC guidelines for hospitalization improve outcomes in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute pericarditis?
Cohort (n=192)
No
Does respecting ESC guidelines for hospitalization improve outcomes in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute pericarditis?
In patients presenting to the emergency department with acute pericarditis, clinical decisions that deviated from ESC hospitalization guidelines did not result in worse clinical outcomes.
Background The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases identify predictive factors of poor prognosis and advise either in favor or against hospitalization accordingly. We aim to evaluate the adequacy of hospitalization criteria in a cohort of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute pericarditis. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients admitted to ED with acute pericarditis, from 2009 to 2019. During ED stay, all patients were evaluated by a cardiologist who decided if the patient was to be discharged or hospitalized. Hospitalized and discharged patients were compared regarding the primary outcome, defined by a composite of: the need for pericardiocentesis and/or cardiac surgery, pericarditis recurrence, and all-cause death. The clinical decision was then counterpoised with ESC guidelines. Results A total of 192 patients were included in the analysis (median age 44.5 years old, 83.3% male) of which 87 (45.5%) were hospitalized. A total of 25% registered the primary outcome, mainly due to acute pericarditis recurrence, occurring in 21.9%. Predictors of recurrence were: glucocorticoid therapy (Odds Ratio [OR]=11.93, 95% Confidence Inirtval [CI] 3.13-45.5, p<0.001), fever at admission (OR=2.67, 95% CI 1.29-5.49, p=0.008), immunosuppression (OR=4.03, 95% CI 1.280-12.659, p=0.017) and increased cardiothoracic index (OR 3.85, CI 95% 1.67-8.86, p=0.002). Regarding hospitalisation/discharge decision, the ESC guidelines were respected in 73.4% of the cases. However, no significant difference in the primary outcome was noted whether the ESC guidelines were respected or not (27.5% vs. 24.3%, p=0.707). Conclusions Discrepancy between current guidelines and the clinical decision did not translate into a different outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferreira et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Acute pericarditis (n=192). Adherence to ESC hospitalization guidelines vs. Non-adherence to ESC hospitalization guidelines was evaluated on Composite of need for pericardiocentesis and/or cardiac surgery, pericarditis recurrence, and all-cause death (p=0.707). Adherence to ESC hospitalization guidelines for acute pericarditis did not significantly change the primary composite outcome compared to non-adherence (27.5% vs. 24.3%, p=0.707).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: