Key result
ESC and AHA/ACC guidelines show poor concordance in ACHD complexity, agreeing in only ~43% of moderate cases.
Why the study?
Latin American registries of ACHD clinical and demographic profiles are scarce, and international guidelines classify disease complexity using different approaches.
Cross-Sectional (n=3,459)
No
There is limited concordance between the ESC and AHA/ACC guidelines for categorizing moderate complexity adult congenital heart disease, highlighting the need for a unified physiological and anatomical classification system.
Guideline discordance on moderate ACHD complexity warrants caution in risk stratification; leaves open the need for a unified classification system.
Background: Latin American registries of clinical and demographic profiles of ACHD are scarce. International guidelines classify disease complexity with different approaches. With these two regards, a registry was carried out to examine factors associated with mortality and to compare severity classifications in our population. Methods and results: method. Binomial logistic regression models were used to examine correlates of mortality. 3459 patients were included [56 % women, median age 34 years (IQR 24-50)]; 83.41 % were alive and 4.11 % died. The subjects had the following characteristics: 74.18 % were in NYHA I FC, 87.30 % had SVEF ≥50 %, 18.42 % developed arrhythmias, 58.92 % were surgically repaired, 7.05 % received palliative management, and 0.03 % were in heart transplant protocol. The agreement between ESC and AHA/ACC complexity classifications was low (43.29 %) in moderate ACHD, and high (83.10 %) in severe disease. Mortality was higher in patients with NYHA III-IV FC, arrhythmias and under palliative care. Conclusion: This study found that ESC and AHA/ACC complexity classifications have limited concordance in categorizing moderate complexity CHD. Reparative procedures had lower mortality odds than palliative care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
García‐Cruz et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD) (n=3,459). ESC and AHA/ACC ACHD complexity classifications was evaluated on Agreement between ESC and AHA/ACC complexity classifications (Kappa 0.32, 95% CI 0.29-0.34, p=<0.001). The 2020 ESC and 2018 AHA/ACC guidelines showed only fair overall agreement (Kappa 0.32) in classifying adult congenital heart disease complexity, with particularly low concordance (43.29%) in moderate cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: