Key result
Higher vascular fibrosis on pre-procedural CT is linked to ~2.8-fold higher powered sheath use during lead extraction.
Why the study?
Retrospective studies suggested lead fibrosis on CT indicates difficult lead extraction, but prospective evaluation using a standardized gated cardiac CT protocol was needed.
Does higher vascular fibrosis detected on pre-procedural gated cardiac CT predict the need for powered sheaths during transvenous lead extraction in patients with indwelling leads >1 year?
Cohort (n=200)
Blinded
Yes
Does higher vascular fibrosis detected on pre-procedural gated cardiac CT predict the need for powered sheaths during transvenous lead extraction in patients with indwelling leads >1 year?
Pre-procedural gated cardiac CT evaluation of vascular fibrosis aids in predicting the procedural complexity of transvenous lead extraction.
CT fibrosis on gated CT was associated with greater powered sheath use in lead extraction; hypothesis-generating for pre-procedural risk stratification and requires prospective validation.
Background: Difficulty of lead extraction does not track well with procedural complications, but several small retrospective studies have lead fibrosis on computed tomography as an important indicator of difficult lead extraction. The purpose of the present study was to apply a standardized gated cardiac computed tomography (CT) protocol to assess fibrosis and study it prospectively to examine the need for powered sheaths and risk outcomes. Methods: We performed a prospective, blinded, multicenter, international study at high-volume lead extraction centers and included patients referred for transvenous lead extraction with at least one lead with a dwell time >1 year and ability to receive a cardiac CT. The degree of fibrosis (as measured by amount of lead adherence to vessel wall) was graded on a scale of 1 to 4 by dedicated CT readers in 3 zones (vein entry to superior vena cava, superior vena cava, and right atrium to lead tip). The primary outcome of the study was number of extractions requiring powered sheaths at zone 2 for each fibrosis group. Results: A total of 200 patients were enrolled in the trial with 196 completing full gated CT and lead extraction analysis. The primary endpoint of powered sheath (laser and mechanical) sheath use was significantly higher in patients with higher fibrosis seen on CT (scores 3+4; 67.8%) at the zone 2 compared to patients with lower fibrosis (scores 1+2; 38.6%; P <0.001). There were 5 major complications with 3 vascular lacerations all occurring in zone 2 in the study. Conclusions: Gated, contrasted CT can predict the need for powered sheaths by identification of fibrosis but did not identify an absolute low-risk cohort who would not need powered sheaths. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03772704.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Transvenous lead extraction (n=200). Higher vascular fibrosis (scores 3-4) on gated cardiac CT vs. Lower vascular fibrosis (scores 1-2) on gated cardiac CT was evaluated on Powered sheath (laser and mechanical) use at zone 2 (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.22-6.31, p=0.015). Higher vascular fibrosis detected on pre-procedural gated cardiac CT was significantly associated with an increased need for powered sheaths during transvenous lead extraction compared to lower fibrosis (67.8% vs 38.6%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: