Key result
Mitiglinide/voglibose significantly reduced the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions by 52.6 mg/dL compared to glimepiride, though it did not significantly affect vascular endothelial function.
Why the study?
Does fixed-dose mitiglinide/voglibose combination improve vascular endothelial function and glycemic variability compared to glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes?
RCT (n=30)
Open-label
Blocked randomization
Yes
Does fixed-dose mitiglinide/voglibose combination improve vascular endothelial function and glycemic variability compared to glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes?
A fixed-dose mitiglinide/voglibose combination significantly reduced glycemic variability and hypoglycemia compared to glimepiride in type 2 diabetes, without affecting vascular endothelial function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mitiglinide/voglibose reduced glycemic variability versus glimepiride without RHI difference; supports trials on long-term vascular outcomes.
This multicenter, open-label, randomized, crossover study compared the effects of fixed-dose mitiglinide/voglibose combination tablet with glimepiride on vascular endothelial function and glycemic variability in 30 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients received either mitiglinide/voglibose (three times daily administration of 10 mg mitiglinide and 0.2 mg voglibose) or glimepiride (once-daily 2 mg) in random order, for 5 days (n = 15/group). Reactive hyperemia index (RHI) and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) were measured as co-primary endpoints using reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry and continuous glucose monitoring. Although no significant difference was observed in RHI, MAGE was significantly lower in the mitiglinide/voglibose group (47.6 ± 18.5 mg/dL) than in the glimepiride group (100.6 ± 32.2 mg/dL). Compared to glimepiride, the use of mitiglinide/voglibose was associated with lower standard deviation of mean glucose, coefficient of variation and mean postprandial glucose excursion. Time below range (< 70 mg/dL) and time above range (> 180, > 200, and 250 mg/dL) were lower in the mitiglinide/voglibose group, while time in range (70–180 mg/dL) was higher. Although not impacting vascular endothelial function, mitiglinide/voglibose demonstrated potential benefits in reducing glycemic variability, postprandial hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanaka et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=30). Fixed-dose mitiglinide/voglibose combination vs. Glimepiride 2 mg once daily was evaluated on Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) (MD -52.6, 95% CI -62.0, -43.2, p=<0.001). Mitiglinide/voglibose significantly reduced the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions by 52.6 mg/dL compared to glimepiride, though it did not significantly affect vascular endothelial function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: