Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This present study develops an integrated framework of WRF-CHEM simulation and Random Forest algorithm to improve PM10 predictions over Himalayan region India. The WRF-CHEM simulations showed a clear seasonal fluctuation in PM10 levels, with wintertime concentrations being higher due to increased biomass burning, decreased boundary layer height, and atmospheric stability. Large-scale pollution patterns were well represented by WRF-CHEM. To compare the observed surface PM10 concentrations with WRF-CHEM simulations, the random forest algorithm is used by including WRF-CHEM simulated meteorological/air pollutants values and considering the spatiotemporal characteristics as input parameters for the random forest algorithm. The obtained bias-corrected predictions for Raipur (30.29°N, 78.09°E; ASL ∼483 m), Rudrapur (28.97°N, 79.40°E; ASL ∼217 m), Kashipur (29.21°N, 78.96°E; ASL ∼218 m), and Clock Tower (30.32°N, 78.04°E; ASL ∼447 m) achieved a correlation of 0.76, 0.71, 0.85 and 0.72 respectively while index of agreement were 0.86, 0.82, 0.6 and 0.77 respectively. The integrated WRF-CHEM and Random Forest framework demonstrated substantial improvements in PM10 estimations across diverse topography. These findings signify the necessity of incorporating topographic variability into post-processing of chemical transport model outputs to refine air quality predictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tripathi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: