Key result
Experienced runners completing a 24-hour ultramarathon had significantly greater increases in cTnT (P=0.021), NT-proBNP (P=0.006), and cortisol (P=0.03) compared to novice runners.
Why the study?
The clinical significance of cardiac biomarker responses in ultra-endurance runners remains incompletely elucidated because events vary in distance and duration, and competitors modulate running intensity according to individual capacity.
Are cardiac biomarker responses associated with 24-hour ultramarathon performance and running experience?
Observational (n=25)
Are cardiac biomarker responses associated with 24-hour ultramarathon performance and running experience?
Cardiac biomarker elevations during a 24-hour ultramarathon are associated with running performance and are higher in experienced runners, suggesting a more hemodynamically challenged heart rather than clinical risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suggests extreme endurance-induced biomarker elevations reflect physiological strain rather than acute pathology; leaves open whether.
PurposeClinical significance of cardiac biomarkers response in ultra-endurance runners are not completely elucidated because events vary in distance/duration and competitors modulate running intensity according to individual running capacity. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between self-selected exercise intensity with cardiac biomarkers comparing experienced (EXP, N = 11) and novice (NOV, N = 14) runners able to finish a 24h ultramarathon (24UM) with significant differences in performance.MethodsCardiac biomarkers (i.e. CKMB/totalCK, cTnT and NT-proBNP), inflammatory markers (i.e. leukocytes and CRP) and cortisol were analyzed before and after a 24UM.ResultsEXP finished the race with significant (p < 0.05) longer distance than NOV (158.8 ± 15.8 vs 116.8 ± 10.3 Km). Two-way mixed ANOVA showed significant time × performance level interaction with greater increase of cTnT (F(1,23) = 6.18, p = 0.021), NT-proBNP (F(1,23) = 9.27, p = 0.006) and cortisol (F(1, 23) = 5.13, p = 0.03) in the EXP group. CKMB/totalCK (F(1, 23) = 71.90, p < 0.0001) decreased while leukocytes (F(1, 23) = 100.06, p < 0.0001) and CRP (F(1, 23) = 93.37, p < 0.0001) increased in both groups (main effect of time). Correlations were found between 24UM distance and cortisol (r = 0.58; p = 0.002), CKMB (r = 0.47; p = 0.017), cTnT (r = 0.44; p = 0.027) or NT-proBNP (r = 0.56; p = 0.003). Cortisol and NT-proBNP were also significantly correlated (r = 0.51; p = 0.01).ConclusionsAlthough there is no clear evidence of cardiac risk when comparing cardiac biomarkers levels with clinical cut-off values, cardiac biomarkers are associated with running performance and pituitary-adrenocortical system response. In EXP runners, higher levels of cardiac biomarkers and cortisol suggest a more hemodynamically challenged heart during prolonged endurance exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hohl et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Ultra-endurance runners (n=25). Experienced running level vs. Novice running level was evaluated on Cardiac biomarkers (cTnT, NT-proBNP) and cortisol response (p=0.021 for cTnT, 0.006 for NT-proBNP). Experienced runners completing a 24-hour ultramarathon had significantly greater increases in cTnT (P=0.021), NT-proBNP (P=0.006), and cortisol (P=0.03) compared to novice runners.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: