Why the study?
The study aimed to observe acute changes in cardiac biomarkers using novel electrical cardiometry in 24-h and 48-h ultramarathoners, and evaluate whether alterations in cardiac responses were associated with average running speed.
What are the acute changes in electrical cardiometry and cardiac biomarkers following 24-h and 48-h ultramarathons?
What are the acute changes in electrical cardiometry and cardiac biomarkers following 24-h and 48-h ultramarathons?
Ultramarathon running induces significant acute changes in hemodynamics and marked elevations in cardiac biomarkers, which correlate with running mileage.
Our study aimed to (i) utilize novel electrical cardiometry and observe acute changes in cardiac biomarkers among 24-h and 48-h ultra-marathoners, and (ii) examine whether alterations in cardiac responses were associated with the average running speed of these participants. Twenty-four 24-h and sixteen 48-h ultra-marathoners were recruited. Electrical cardiometry in the 2 groups showed significant post-race drops in systolic pressure (24-h: p=0.001; 48-h: p=0.016) and rapid increases in heart rate (24-h, p=0.004; 48-h, p=0.001). Cardiac output increased in 48-h runners (p=0.012) and stroke volume decreased in 24-h runners (p=0.009) at post-test. Six of 20 (30%) 24-h and 4 of 16 (25%) 48-h runners had high-sensitivity troponin T values above the reference interval after the races. N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide levels showed a 15-fold increase in 24-h runners and a 10-fold increase in 48-h runners at post-race. There was a positive correlation between delta N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide and running mileage (rs=0.629, p=0.003) in 24-h ultra-marathoners. In conclusion, stroke volume and cardiac output showed inconsistent changes between the 2 groups. Average running speed has a significant effect on post-exercise elevation in cardiac biomarkers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: