Key result
Lower stress myocardial blood flow measured by PET predicted ventricular arrhythmias in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (HR 0.84 per 0.1 mL/g/min increase; P=0.015).
Why the study?
Evidence supporting ICD implantation is less robust in NICM than ischemic cardiomyopathy, necessitating improved risk stratification for sudden cardiac death.
Does absolute stress myocardial blood flow measured by PET predict ventricular arrhythmias and mortality in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=37)
Does absolute stress myocardial blood flow measured by PET predict ventricular arrhythmias and mortality in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy?
Hazard Ratio: 0.84
Absolute Event Rate: 67% vs 13%
p-value: p=.015
In patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, lower stress myocardial blood flow on PET imaging predicts ventricular arrhythmias, which may aid in risk stratification for ICD implantation.
sMBF by PET may refine VA risk stratification in NICM; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
INTRODUCTION: Sudden cardiac death is a substantial cause of mortality in patients with cardiomyopathy, but evidence supporting implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation is less robust in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) than in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Improved risk stratification is needed. We assessed whether absolute quantification of stress myocardial blood flow (sMBF) measured by positron emission tomography (PET) predicts ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and/or death in patients with NICM. METHODS: In this pilot study, we prospectively followed patients with NICM (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%) and an ICD who underwent cardiac PET stress imaging with sMBF quantification. NICM was defined as the absence of angiographic obstructive coronary stenosis, significant relative perfusion defects on imaging, coronary revascularization, or acute coronary syndrome. Endpoints were appropriate device therapy for VA and all-cause mortality. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients who had no prior history of VA (ie, the primary prevention population). RESULTS: We followed 37 patients (60 ± 14 years, 46% male) for 41 ± 23 months. The median sMBF was 1.56 mL/g/min (interquartile range: 1.00-1.82). Lower sMBF predicted VA, both in the whole population (hazard ratio [HR] for each 0.1 mL/g/min increase: 0.84, P = .015) and in the primary prevention subset (n = 27; HR for each 0.1 mL/g/min increase: 0.81, P = .049). Patients with sMBF below the median had significantly more VA than those above the median, both in the whole population (P = .004) and in the primary prevention subset (P = .046). Estimated 3-year VA rates in the whole population were 67% among low-flow patients vs 13% among high-flow patients, and 39% vs 8%, respectively, among primary-prevention patients. sMBF did not predict all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NICM, lower sMBF predicts VA. This relationship may be useful for risk stratification for ventricular arrhythmia and decision making regarding ICD implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Middour et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Nonischemic cardiomyopathy (n=37). Lower stress myocardial blood flow (sMBF) vs. Higher sMBF was evaluated on Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) (HR 0.84, p=.015). Lower stress myocardial blood flow measured by PET predicted ventricular arrhythmias in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (HR 0.84 per 0.1 mL/g/min increase; P=0.015).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: