Key result
Only ~19% of European adult congenital heart disease specialist centres meet optimal care structure standards.
Cross-Sectional (n=71)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: The increasing number of adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) has prompted the development of recommendations for the management of these patients and for the organization of their healthcare. The aim of this report is to describe the delivery of care in Europe for adults with congenital cardiac anomalies. METHODS AND RESULTS: As part of the Euro Heart Survey on Adult Congenital Heart Disease, we obtained data from 71 voluntarily participating centres that detailed their care practices for these patients. Forty-eight of these centres were specialist centres and 23 were non-specialist centres. We found that only 19% of the specialist centres complied with defined standards for optimal care structure. The criteria that appeared to be most difficult for all centres to achieve were performing 50 congenital heart operations or more per year and involving nurse specialists in the care of these patients. CONCLUSION: This survey indicated that the provision of care in Europe for adults with congenital heart defects is suboptimal. To fully realize the benefits of cardiac surgery performed in infants and children, continuous effort must be applied by healthcare professionals in order to implement the recommendations on the organization of care for these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moons et al. (2006) conducted a cross-sectional in Adult congenital heart disease (n=71). Delivery of care practices was evaluated on Compliance with defined standards for optimal care structure. Only 19% of specialist centres in Europe complied with defined standards for optimal care structure for adults with congenital heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: