Key result
The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol significantly reduced mean postoperative length of stay from 9.50 to 6.93 days (p=0.0084) compared to conventional care in patients undergoing elective resection for T4 colorectal cancer.
Why the study?
Patients with advanced disease such as T4 colorectal cancers are frequently excluded from ERAS programs due to difficulty applying protocols, leaving the feasibility and short-term outcomes unclear.
Does the ERAS protocol improve postoperative recovery in patients with T4 colorectal cancer?
Cohort (n=82)
No
Does the ERAS protocol improve postoperative recovery in patients with T4 colorectal cancer?
Absolute Event Rate: 6.93% vs 9.5%
p-value: p=0.0084
The ERAS protocol is feasible and enhances postoperative recovery in patients undergoing surgery for T4 colorectal cancer.
ERAS appears feasible in T4 colorectal cancer; leaves open whether it improves outcomes enough to warrant routine adoption pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Programs of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery reduces morbidity and shorten recovery in patients undergoing colorectal resections for cancer. Patients presenting with more advanced disease such as T4 cancers, are frequently excluded from undergoing ERAS programs due to the difficulty in applying the whole or part of established protocols. The primary aim of this investigation was to evaluate the possibility of applying a validated ERAS protocol in patients undergoing colorectal resection for T4 colon and rectal cancer and to evaluate the short-term outcome. METHODS: Single center, retrospective cohort study. All patients with a clinical diagnosis of stage T4 colorectal cancer undergoing surgery between November 2016 to January 2020 were treated following the institutional fast track protocol without exclusion. Short-term postoperative outcomes were compared to those of a control group treated with conventional care and that underwent surgical resection for T4 colorectal cancer at the same institution from January 2010 to October 2016. Data from both groups were collected retrospectively from a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were diagnosed with T4 cancer, 49 patients were included in the ERAS cohort and 33 in the historical conventional care cohort. Both, the mean time of tolerance to solid food diet and postoperative length of stay, were significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the control group (3.14±1,76 vs 4.8±1.52; p<0,0001 and 6,93±3,76 vs 9,50±4,83; p=0,0084 respectively). No differences in perioperative complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this cohort study from a single center registry, shows that ERAS protocol is feasible also in T4 colorectal patients and enhance postoperative recovery in this group of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bellato et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in cT4 colorectal cancer (n=82). Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol vs. Conventional perioperative care was evaluated on Postoperative length of stay (days) (p=0.0084). The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol significantly reduced mean postoperative length of stay from 9.50 to 6.93 days (p=0.0084) compared to conventional care in patients undergoing elective resection for T4 colorectal cancer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: