Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents findings from three randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of light-touch, behaviorally informed interventions promoting the uptake of a cover crop cost-share program. Cover cropping can bring many long-term agricultural benefits; however, cover crop adoption in the Midwest region of the United States remains low. Financial incentives such as cost-share programs have been shown to increase cover crop adoption, yet many farmers do not apply to these programs. In partnership with the Practical Farmers of Iowa and a large agriculture co-op, we tested the effectiveness of three light-touch interventions that were designed using principles from behavioral science: email- and text-based farmer referral reminders (Test 1), postcards (Test 2), and letters (Test 3). We also investigated the impact of a raffle incentive for the mailers. Results from Test 1 (Referrals) indicated that while referral reminders increased the frequency of information sharing about the Practical Farmers of Iowa’s cover crop cost-share program, they did not significantly impact successful referrals or enrollment rates. For both Tests 2 (Postcards) and 3 (Letters), we did not observe any statistically significant differences in enrollment rates between experimental groups. However, postcards with a raffle incentive showed a marginally significant effect in prompting earlier enrollment. Understanding the effects and limits of light-touch behavioral interventions provides useful insights that could inform the design and implementation of private programs aimed at promoting sustainable agriculture among midwestern farmers. This study suggests that light-touch communication modes such as email, text messages, and mail may not be the best channels to boost enrollment for private cost-share programs targeting midwestern farmers. Future research could examine other ways to leverage farmer networks in promoting the uptake of programs that incentivize sustainable agricultural practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: