Phosphorus (P) from historic P applications stored in agricultural soils can be drawn down by harvesting crops without fully replacing harvested P with P fertilizer, thereby potentially reducing a source of P loss to surface waterways that impairs water quality. Soil P drawdown research has typically consisted of small plot studies, and the applicability of these findings to the field scale remains uncertain. Additionally, soil P drawdown rate studies typically do not quantify the potential water quality benefits. In this study, soil P drawdown rates and edge-of-field P concentrations were measured for 13 years on two commercially farmed crop fields in Ohio with initial average soil test P (STP) measured by Mehlich-3 of 450 and 530 mg kg−1 (0 to 20 cm depth). Drawdown management resulted in declines in soil P in both fields that were fit with exponential decay functions that estimated soil P drawdown rates at 5% per year for STP and 4% per year for water-extractable P (WEP). Soil P drawdown rates were similar at 0 to 5, 5 to 15, and 15 to 30 cm depths but somewhat greater for the 30 to 50 cm depth. Water quality measurements indicated that annual flow-weighted dissolved reactive P (DRP) and total P (TP) concentrations trended down for both surface runoff and tile drainage water. In each field, one of the four combinations of loss pathway and P form had statistically significant linear trends: DRP declined by 0.07 mg L−1 y−1 in tile drainage from one field, and TP in surface runoff declined by 0.17 mg L−1 y−1 from the other field. These results clearly show that commercial crop production without P fertilization resulted in significant reductions in soil P concentrations that were in turn reflected in edge-of-field P concentration reductions. However, the annual rates of change in both soil and edge-of-field P concentrations were relatively small, indicating that decades would be required to meet soil P and water quality goals through drawdown alone on fields with elevated soil P.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osterholz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: