Key result
Three-dimensional prosthesis overlay planning for TAVI showed that oversizing was associated with new pacemakers in 85% of patients, and undersizing with paravalvular leakage in 66%.
Why the study?
Does simulated three-dimensional prosthesis overlay procedure planning improve valve selection and reduce complications in patients undergoing TAVI?
Observational (n=81)
Does simulated three-dimensional prosthesis overlay procedure planning improve valve selection and reduce complications in patients undergoing TAVI?
Three-dimensional prosthesis overlay using MDCT data for TAVI planning is feasible and may reduce complications such as pacemaker implantation and paravalvular leakage by optimizing valve sizing.
3D planning may support TAVI valve selection; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that simulated three-dimensional prosthesis overlay procedure planning may support valve selection in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures. METHODS: Preoperative multidimensional computed tomography (MDCT) data sets from 81 consecutive TAVI patients were included in the study. A planning tool was developed, which semiautomatically creates a three-dimensional model of the aortic root from these data. Three-dimensional templates of the commonly used TAVI implants are spatially registered with the patient data and presented as graphic overlay. Fourteen physicians used the tool to perform retrospective planning of TAVI procedures. Results of prosthesis sizing were compared with the prosthesis size used in the actually performed procedure, and the patients were accordingly divided into three groups: those with equal size (concordance with retrospective planning), oversizing (retrospective planning of a smaller prosthesis), and undersizing (retrospective planning of a larger prosthesis). RESULTS: In the oversizing group, 85% of the patients had new pacemaker implantation. In the undersizing group, in 66%, at least mild paravalvular leakage was observed (greater than grade 1 in one third of the cases). In 46% of the patients in the equal-size group, neither of these complications was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional prosthesis overlay in MDCT-derived patient data for patient-specific planning of TAVI procedures is feasible. It may improve valve selection compared with two-dimensional MDCT planning and thus yield better outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sündermann et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) (n=81). Simulated three-dimensional prosthesis overlay procedure planning vs. Actual prosthesis size used was evaluated on Complications (new pacemaker implantation or paravalvular leakage) based on prosthesis sizing concordance. Three-dimensional prosthesis overlay planning for TAVI showed that oversizing was associated with new pacemakers in 85% of patients, and undersizing with paravalvular leakage in 66%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: