Key result
Synchronized vagal stimulation elicited a heart rate response characterized by both a slow dynamic component (low-pass filter behavior) and a fast component related to beat-to-beat variations.
Why the study?
How does synchronized vagal stimulation affect heart rate response dynamics in anesthetized dogs?
How does synchronized vagal stimulation affect heart rate response dynamics in anesthetized dogs?
Synchronized vagal stimulation in a canine model demonstrates that heart rate response is governed by both slow dynamic and fast beat-to-beat components.
Transfer function estimates from vagal interpulse variation characterize canine HR dynamics; leaves open human autonomic translation.
Synchronized electrical stimulation was used to study the heart rate (HR) response to fluctuations in parasympathetic input to the sinus node in anesthetized dogs. This was obtained by varying the time interval (interpulse interval) between stimulatory vagal pulses. Spectral methods were used to estimate transfer functions between the excitatory signal and the resulting HR response for different intensities of vagal stimulation. The intensity of vagal stimulation was proportional to the number of pulses delivered in each cardiac cycle. From the estimated transfer functions, and based on a mathematical model of the time course of ACh concentration at the sinus node, filter models were derived by using a system identification approach. HR response was characterized by a combination of two different filter behaviors: a low-pass filter behavior of mean cut-off frequency of 0.065 Hz and an all-pass filter behavior. The magnitude of the low-pass filter gain decreased with increasing intensity of vagal stimulation. The magnitude of the all-pass filter gain increased and then decreased with increasing intensity of vagal stimulation. The all-pass filter characteristics of HR response during synchronized stimulation of the vagus nerves are specific to this mode of stimulation, because they were not observed in nonsynchronized modes of vagal stimulation. We can conclude that, during synchronized vagal stimulation, the HR response exhibits both a slow dynamic component and a fast component related to beat-to-beat variations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mokrane et al. (1995) studied this question. Synchronized electrical vagal stimulation vs. Nonsynchronized modes of vagal stimulation was evaluated on Heart rate response (transfer functions between excitatory signal and HR response). Synchronized vagal stimulation elicited a heart rate response characterized by both a slow dynamic component (low-pass filter behavior) and a fast component related to beat-to-beat variations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: