Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the present study, Mg (1.98 and 2.5) vol % TiO₂ nanocomposites are primarily synthesized utilizing solid-phase blend-press-sinter powder metallurgy (PM) technique and liquid-phase disintegrated melt deposition technique (DMD) followed by hot extrusion. Microstructural characterization of the synthesized Mg-TiO₂ nanocomposites indicated significant grain refinement with DMD synthesized Mg nanocomposites exhibiting as high as ~47% for 2.5 vol % TiO₂ NPs addition. X-ray diffraction studies indicated that texture randomization of pure Mg depends not only on the critical amount of TiO₂ NPs added to the Mg matrix but also on the adopted synthesis methodology. Irrespective of the processing technique, theoretically predicted tensile yield strength of Mg-TiO₂ nanocomposites was found to be primarily governed by Hall-Petch mechanism. Among the synthesized Mg materials, solid-phase synthesized Mg 1.98 vol % TiO₂ nanocomposite exhibited a maximum tensile fracture strain of ~14.5%. Further, the liquid-phase synthesized Mg-TiO₂ nanocomposites exhibited higher tensile and compression properties than those primarily processed by solid-phase synthesis. The tensile-compression asymmetry values of the synthesized Mg-TiO₂ nanocomposite was found to be lower than that of pure Mg with solid-phase synthesized Mg 1.98 vol % TiO₂ nanocomposite exhibiting as low as 1.06.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meenashisundaram et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: