Why the study?
Coronary artery embolism is an underrecognized cause of myocardial infarction in patients with limited atherosclerosis, and pulmonary vein thrombosis as an embolic source has rarely been described.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cocaine use combined with inherited thrombophilia can provoke pulmonary vein thrombosis and coronary artery embolism, requiring systematic embolic source evaluation and tailored antithrombotic management.
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery embolism (CAE) is an underrecognized cause of myocardial infarction, particularly in patients with limited coronary atherosclerosis. Pulmonary vein thrombosis (PVT) as an embolic source of CAE has rarely been described. CASE SUMMARY: A 48-year-old woman with active cocaine use and Factor V Leiden mutation presented following out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Coronary angiography revealed thrombotic left circumflex artery occlusion without atherosclerosis. Computed tomography identified a nonocclusive left superior pulmonary vein thrombus as a possible embolic source. Drug-eluting stent implantation and apixaban were initiated; ticagrelor was de-escalated to clopidogrel given anticoagulation. Thrombus resolved at 12 weeks. DISCUSSION: Cocaine-provoked PVT causing CAE in inherited thrombophilia is a rare mechanism requiring embolic source evaluation and tailored management. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: In young patients with cryptogenic CAE, cocaine use with inherited thrombophilia should prompt PVT evaluation. When post-percutaneous coronary intervention antiplatelet therapy requires anticoagulation, P2Y12 de-escalation to clopidogrel reduces bleeding risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Coronary artery embolism and pulmonary vein thrombosis (n=1). Percutaneous coronary intervention and tailored antithrombotic therapy was evaluated on Resolution of pulmonary vein thrombus.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: