Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates water accumulation effects on coal–rock pillar stability, suggesting significant deterioration occurs over time.
To reveal the influence of water accumulation in open pits on the stability of boundary coal–rock pillars, this study investigates a boundary coal–rock pillar between an underground coal mine and an adjacent open pit in western China. Coal–rock physical property tests, hydrochemical analysis, permeability tests, and theoretical calculations of water-resisting coal–rock pillars were conducted to examine seepage channel formation, physical property changes, and stability evolution under long-term water accumulation. The results show that the mechanical strength of coal and rock specimens decreases under the saturated state. The uniaxial compressive strength of rock specimens decreases by 8.75–50.64%, while that of No.2−2 and No.3−1 coal specimens decreases by 17.72% and 25.01%, respectively. The tensile strength decreases by 24.59–59.11%, and the shear strength decreases by 4.36–45.96%. The hydraulic conductivity of intact specimens is mostly 10−4~10−3 m/d, whereas that of fractured specimens increases to 10−3~10−2 m/d. The calculated width of water-resisting coal pillars increases by 19.7~21.9% under long-term water accumulation. Long-term water accumulation in the open pit changes the external hydraulic boundary of the boundary coal–rock pillar, allowing water to migrate inward along bedding planes, joints, primary fractures, mining-induced fractures, and coal seam pores. This process promotes the connection of pre-existing pore–fracture structures and seepage channel formation, weakens particle cementation and structural-plane shear resistance, and reduces the structural integrity, bearing capacity, and water-resisting capacity of the coal–rock pillar. Therefore, the stability deterioration of boundary coal–rock pillars is a continuous process involving channel formation, sustained seepage, strength degradation, enhanced pore–fracture connectivity, permeability enhancement, and further stability reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: