Comprehensive review analyzes performance requirements and degradation of CFRP composites in automotive powertrains, suggesting optimal material designs.
Carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites represent promising lightweight materials for automotive powertrain systems, where increasing demands for weight reduction, energy efficiency, and emission reduction are driving the replacement of conventional metallic components. However, automotive powertrain environments expose CFRP materials to elevated temperatures, cyclic mechanical loading, chemical exposure, and tribological interactions, creating complex degradation conditions that significantly influence long-term durability and reliability. This review systematically analyzes CFRP composites for automotive powertrain applications, focusing on the relationship between operational requirements, material selection, reinforcement architecture, manufacturing technologies, and degradation mechanisms. High-performance thermoplastic systems such as CF/PEEK, CF/PPS, and CF/PEKK are critically compared with conventional thermoset composites. CF/PEEK systems demonstrate superior thermomechanical stability, maintaining significant mechanical performance at temperatures approaching 250 °C and tensile strengths of approximately 1400–1600 MPa, whereas CF/PPS composites provide a more economically efficient compromise between thermal resistance, chemical stability, manufacturability, and recyclability for medium-temperature applications. The review further analyzes dominant degradation mechanisms, including creep deformation, fatigue damage, delamination, fibre–matrix interface degradation, and tribological wear. CFRP degradation is shown to result from the interaction of multiple coupled mechanisms rather than from isolated material failure modes. Tribological wear rates typically range from 10−6 to 10−5 mm3/(N·m), while creep–fatigue interactions may reduce component lifetime by up to 40–60% under combined thermomechanical loading. Advanced design strategies, including fibre orientation optimization, laminate architecture tailoring, thickness gradation, and hybrid metal–composite structures, are evaluated together with major manufacturing technologies such as injection moulding, compression moulding, overmoulding, automated fibre placement, and additive manufacturing. The presented review establishes an integrated framework linking material systems, operating conditions, manufacturing processes, and durability requirements for automotive powertrain applications. The analysis demonstrates that no universal CFRP system exists for all powertrain components and that optimal material selection requires balancing thermal stability, fatigue resistance, tribological performance, manufacturability, recyclability, and economic constraints according to the specific operating conditions of each component category.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fekiač et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: