Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates how mitochondrial protein evolution affects translation efficiency in Corvides, suggesting adaptive significance of codon usage.
Mitochondrial codon usage and selective pressures drive adaptive evolution and translation efficiency. This study provides insights into the evolutionary constraints shaping 13 core mitochondrial proteins in Corvides, based on 117 species, including 51 newly assembled genomes. We present evidence linking codon-level sequence architecture, protein structure, and selective pressures. These protein-coding genes (PCGs) are under strong purifying selection, with dN/dS ratios ranging from 0.00779 (MT-CO1) to 0.16214 (MT-ATP8). This conservation is reflected in the 3D model of MT-CO1, where conserved residues cluster within 12 transmembrane helices forming the core of its proton-pumping function. At the sequence level, we identify signatures of selection for translational efficiency, which are critical for accurate synthesis and folding. These signatures include a significant preference for “optimal” codons that perfectly match tRNA anticodons (p < 0.001). We also find lineage-specific features such as codon aversion motifs (CAMs). The MT-ATP6 gene exhibits complete aversion of the CGA codon in Oriolus chinensis and of the ACT codon in O. kundoo. These sequence-level features resolve the deep phylogenetic relationships within the group, demonstrating the effectiveness of our multi-layered analytical framework. Overall, our results link codon-level sequence architecture with protein structural constraints, functional evolutionary signals, and mitochondrial genome evolution in Corvides.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: