Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: It is well known that certain bone diseases of congenital origin are associated with dentomaxillofacial (DOMF) disorders. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the DOMF alterations in pediatric patients with bone diseases in Arusha (Tanzania, East Africa) and Barcelona (Spain, southern Europe). In each area of study, the clinical differences between subgroups of bone diseases in relation to their etiopathogenesis were reported and analysed. MATERIAL (ii) disorders of bone growth/deformity (DGD). RESULTS: Gingival health indexes were significantly better in the HSJD group (p = 0.033). The HSJD group also had better caries indices (DMF-T), though these differences were not significant (p = 0.105). Among dental alterations, dental agenesis was significantly more prevalent in the MMRRH sample (p < 0.001); in this sample, DGD was significantly more frequent than DCM (p = 0.045). Fluorosis was practically non-existent in the HSJD group, but was moderate to severe fluorosis in 26.6% of MMRRH patients and was significantly more prevalent in the MMRRH DCM subgroup (p < 0.001). Malocclusion was more frequent in the MMRRH group (p < 0.001 in the case of Class III inverted overjet and p = 0.008 in the case of crossbite), and in the HSJD group the DCM subgroup presented a more severe overbite and open bite than the DGD subgroup (p = 0.027). Pathological fractures were significantly more frequent in the DGD subgroups in both samples (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a clear relationship between dentomaxillofacial abnormalities and rare bone diseases in the two pediatric populations studied. Comparing the two samples, the East African children displayed higher rates of gingivitis, dental fluorosis and malocclusion than their southern European peers.
Brunet‐Llobet et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: