Key result
CO-OP approach improves activity performance over usual outpatient rehabilitation at 3 months.
RCT (n=35)
Single-blind
Randomized
Yes
Standardized Mean Difference: 0.5
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the effect of the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) approach compared with usual outpatient rehabilitation on activity and participation in people <3 months poststroke. METHODS: An exploratory, single-blind, randomized controlled trial, with a usual-care control arm, was conducted. Participants referred to 2 stroke rehabilitation outpatient programs were randomized to receive either usual care or CO-OP. The primary outcome was actual performance of trained and untrained self-selected activities, measured using the Performance Quality Rating Scale (PQRS). Additional outcomes included the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), the Stroke Impact Scale Participation Domain, the Community Participation Index, and the Self-Efficacy Gauge. RESULTS: A total of 35 eligible participants were randomized; 26 completed the intervention. Post intervention, PQRS change scores demonstrated that CO-OP had a medium effect over usual care on trained self-selected activities (d = 0.5) and a large effect on untrained activities (d = 1.2). At a 3-month follow-up, PQRS change scores indicated a large effect of CO-OP on both trained (d = 1.6) and untrained activities (d = 1.1). CO-OP had a small effect on COPM and a medium effect on the Community Participation Index perceived control and on the Self-Efficacy Gauge. CONCLUSION: CO-OP was associated with a large treatment effect on follow-up performances of self-selected activities and demonstrated transfer to untrained activities. A larger trial is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McEwen et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Subacute stroke (n=35). Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) vs. Usual outpatient rehabilitation was evaluated on Actual performance of trained and untrained self-selected activities, measured using the Performance Quality Rating Scale (PQRS) (d = 0.5 (trained activities) and d = 1.2 (untrained activities) post-intervention). The CO-OP approach significantly improved the performance of both trained (d=1.6) and untrained activities (d=1.1) at 3-month follow-up compared to usual outpatient rehabilitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: