Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Standard expenditure multipliers capture economy-wide effects of new government projects only when financing constraints are not binding. In actual policy-making, however, new projects usually need financing. We show that under liquidity constraints, new projects are subject to two opposite effects: an income effect and a set of spending substitution effects. The former is the traditional, unrestricted, multiplier effect; the latter is the result of expenditure reallocation to uphold effective financing constraints. Unrestricted multipliers will therefore be, as a general rule, upward biased and policy designs based upon them should be reassessed in the light of the countervailing substitution effects. We also propose a novel decomposition of multiplier effects based on internal and external dependencies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guerra et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: