Key result
Telephone-administered Human Activity Profile shows high agreement with face-to-face assessment in CVD patients.
Why the study?
The validity of administering the Human Activity Profile questionnaire via telephone call to patients with cardiovascular disease participating in a cardiovascular rehabilitation program needed to be investigated.
Does telephone administration of the Human Activity Profile questionnaire provide valid results compared to face-to-face administration in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=56)
Does telephone administration of the Human Activity Profile questionnaire provide valid results compared to face-to-face administration in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Mean Difference: -4 (95% CI -19.3–12.1)
Absolute Event Rate: 82.71% vs 79.11%
p-value: p=0.101
The Human Activity Profile questionnaire can be reliably administered via telephone to patients with cardiovascular disease, showing high agreement with face-to-face administration.
May support remote activity assessment in CVD; leaves open larger validation against outcomes.
BACKGROUND To validate the application of the Human Activity Profile (HAP) questionnaire via telephone call in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). OBJECTIVE Objective of this study is to investigate the validity of applying the HAP questionnaire via telephone call to patients with cardiovascular disease participating in a cardiovascular rehabilitation program. METHODS Two scores were calculated based upon HAP scores: the maximum activity score (MAS), the number of the most difficult task the respondent is “still doing”; and the adjusted activity score (AAS), the number of items that the individual “stopped doing”, prior to the last one that he “still does”. Patients with CVD answered the HAP questionnaire on 2 random occasions, face-to-face and by telephone call. RESULTS Fifty-six patients with CVD (64.30% men) with a mean age of 75.14±10.28 years participated in this study. The MAS was similar in both applied modes (Face-to-face: 79.11±11.48; Telephone call: 82.71±7.48; p=0.101). Similarly, The AAS did not differ in both applied modes (Face-to-face: 69.11±14.18; Phone call: 71.21±13.43; p=052). There was high agreement between the two modes of administration (ICC - 0.999; 95%CI, 0.879-0.948; p<0.05). The mean bias and 95% limits of agreement evaluated by Bland-Altman plot for average applied face-to-face and the telephone call versus the mean difference in the MAS and AAS applied face-to-face and the telephone call were, respectively, -4.0 (95%CI 12.1 to -19.3) and -2.1 (95%CI 13.4 to -17.6). CONCLUSIONS The MAS and AAS from HAP can be applied over the telephone call in patients with CVD. CLINICALTRIAL CAAE 58283422.0.0000.5134 (number: 5.646.387)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maria da Glória Rodrigues‐Machado (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease (n=56). Human Activity Profile (HAP) questionnaire via telephone call vs. Face-to-face administration was evaluated on Maximum activity score (MAS) (Mean bias -4.0, 95% CI -19.3 to 12.1, p=0.101). Administration of the Human Activity Profile questionnaire via telephone call showed high agreement with face-to-face administration in patients with cardiovascular disease (ICC 0.999).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: