Key result
The Human Activity Profile showed a bias of 2.18 mL/kg/min for estimating peak O2 compared to CPET (P=0.007), lacking agreement, but correlated with 6MWT distance (r=0.62; P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does the Human Activity Profile accurately estimate functional capacity compared to CPET and 6MWT in patients with heart failure?
Cross-Sectional (n=62)
Does the Human Activity Profile accurately estimate functional capacity compared to CPET and 6MWT in patients with heart failure?
Mean Difference: 2.18
p-value: p=0.007
While the Human Activity Profile does not accurately estimate peak VO2 compared to the gold standard CPET, it correlates with 6MWT distance and differentiates NYHA classes, making it a useful functional assessment tool in heart failure.
PURPOSE: To investigate (1) the validity of using the Human Activity Profile (HAP) in patients with heart failure (HF) to estimate functional capacity; (2) the association between the HAP and 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) distance; and (3) the ability of the HAP to differentiate between New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classes. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we evaluated 62 clinically stable patients with HF (mean age, 47.98 years; NYHA class I-III). Variables included maximal functional capacity as measured by peak oxygen uptake ((Equation is included in full-text article.)O2) using a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), peak (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 as estimated by the HAP, and exercise capacity as measured by the 6MWT. RESULTS: The difference between the measured (CPET) and estimated (HAP) peak (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 against the average values showed a bias of 2.18 mL/kg/min (P = .007). No agreement was seen between these measures when applying the Bland-Altman method. Peak (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 in the HAP showed a moderate association with the 6MWT distance (r = 0.62; P < .0001). Peak (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 in the HAP was able to statistically differentiate NYHA functional classes I, II, and III (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The estimated peak (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2 using the HAP was not concordant with the gold standard CPET measure. On the contrary, the HAP was able to differentiate NYHA functional class associated with the 6MWT distance; therefore, the HAP is a useful tool for assessing functional performance in patients with HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ribeiro-Samora et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in heart failure (n=62). Human Activity Profile (HAP) vs. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) was evaluated on Difference between measured (CPET) and estimated (HAP) peak O2 (bias of 2.18 mL/kg/min, p=0.007). The Human Activity Profile showed a bias of 2.18 mL/kg/min for estimating peak O2 compared to CPET (P=0.007), lacking agreement, but correlated with 6MWT distance (r=0.62; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: