Key result
Regional citrate anticoagulation is preferred over heparin for CRRT to minimize bleeding risk.
Continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRTs) allow for gradual solute and fluid removal. In very sick patients with acute renal failure, they may be better tolerated than hemodialysis. The major drawback to CRRTs is the need for anticoagulation to maintain filter patency. The patients who are likely to benefit from CRRTs are also at higher risk for bleeding from systemic anticoagulation. The most commonly used form of anticoagulation for CRRTs, low-dose heparin, causes bleeding in 10-50% of patients. Regional anticoagulation using protamine may reduce the risk of bleeding, but it is difficult to use. Low molecular weight heparin and prostacyclin both may partially reduce bleeding, but are difficult to dose. Regional anticoagulation with citrate is easy to use and has been shown to prolong filter life without systemic anticoagulation. It is the anticoagulant of choice for most patients on CRRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abramson et al. (1999) conducted a review in Acute renal failure. Regional anticoagulation with citrate vs. Low-dose heparin was evaluated. Regional anticoagulation with citrate is the preferred choice for continuous renal replacement therapy to avoid the 10-50% bleeding risk associated with low-dose heparin.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: