Key result
Xpert MTB/RIF testing of pericardial fluid detects TB in a tamponade patient, enabling early therapy.
Why the study?
Tuberculous pericarditis remains diagnostically challenging because of nonspecific clinical features and the limited sensitivity of conventional diagnostic methods.
Case Report (n=1)
Xpert MTB/RIF testing on pericardial fluid can provide rapid and specific diagnosis of tuberculous pericarditis when conventional methods are negative.
Tuberculous pericarditis (TBP) is an uncommon but serious form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis that remains diagnostically challenging due to its nonspecific clinical features and the limited sensitivity of conventional methods such as smear microscopy, culture, and histopathology. We describe an 80‐year‐old man presenting with recurrent fever and weakness, found to have a large pericardial effusion with tamponade physiology requiring emergent pericardial window drainage. Pericardial fluid analysis demonstrated an exudative, lymphocyte‐predominant effusion with elevated lactate dehydrogenase and low glucose levels, but initial acid‐fast bacillus smear, histopathology, and sputum studies were negative. Xpert MTB/RIF testing performed on pericardial fluid detected Mycobacterium tuberculosis , enabling early initiation of antitubercular therapy prior to culture confirmation. This case underscores the importance of considering TBP in patients with unexplained pericardial effusion, particularly in those with epidemiologic risk factors, and highlights the diagnostic value of Xpert MTB/RIF as a rapid and highly specific molecular assay that can expedite diagnosis and improve clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nanda et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Tuberculous pericarditis (n=1). Xpert MTB/RIF testing was evaluated on Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Xpert MTB/RIF testing on pericardial fluid detected Mycobacterium tuberculosis in 1 patient (an 80-year-old man) with tamponade, enabling early antitubercular therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: