Key result
Think Aloud during incrementally paced cycling did not disrupt performance outcomes and resulted in significantly lower %HRmax, blood lactate, and RPE from stage 2 onwards compared to silent cycling.
Why the study?
The study aimed to investigate the effect of Think Aloud on cycling performance and brain oxygenation in trained and untrained participants during incrementally paced cycling.
Does the Think Aloud method affect performance and brain oxygenation in trained and untrained participants during incrementally paced cycling?
Does the Think Aloud method affect performance and brain oxygenation in trained and untrained participants during incrementally paced cycling?
The Think Aloud method does not disrupt cycling performance and may elicit a better pacing strategy by lowering physiological strain at similar power outputs.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of Think Aloud (TA) on performance in trained and untrained participants, using functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy, during incrementally paced cycling. A mixed design was implemented with cycling expertise (10 untrained vs. 9 trained) as the between groups variable and trial stage (5 stages of increasing effort), and condition (silent vs. TA) as within groups independent variables (IVs). Dependent measures were changes in cortical oxygenation (O 2 Hb) in 12 areas of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and physiological indicators of percentage heart rate maximum (%HRmax), average power output (APO), peak power output (PPO), rate of perceived exertion (RPE) and blood lactate ([La]b) over time. Trained cyclists had higher APO and significantly higher PPO from stages 2–5, in addition to a greater increase in PPO over the duration of the test (range 168W–480 W vs. 133W–313 W). There were significant main effects of stage on %HRmax, Bla and RPE ( p < .001), with effect sizes (ήp 2 ) ranging from .31 to .97. On average, HRmax%, [La]b and RPE were significantly lower after stage 2 onwards within the TA trial than the silent trial, even though similar power outputs were obtained. Thus, the TA trial elicited a better pacing strategy. There was no main effect of group on changes in O 2 Hb, though O 2 Hb did change as a function of stage in four areas of the PFC, and as a function of condition in one area. In this first study to assess the effects of TA on performance during self-paced cycling, TA did not disrupt performance outcomes at low through to high levels of physical exertion for either untrained or trained participants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whitehead et al. (2022) studied this question. Think Aloud (TA) vs. Silent condition was evaluated on Changes in cortical oxygenation (O2Hb) in the prefrontal cortex and physiological indicators (%HRmax, average power output, peak power output, RPE, and blood lactate). Think Aloud during incrementally paced cycling did not disrupt performance outcomes and resulted in significantly lower %HRmax, blood lactate, and RPE from stage 2 onwards compared to silent cycling.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: