Key result
New multicenter protocol outlines planned evaluation of automated fetal cardiac parameters in CHD.
Why the study?
Fetal cardiac function parameters could identify fetuses with congenital heart disease at risk of heart failure, but clinical translation is limited by poor repeatability and lack of standardization.
Do automated fetal cardiac function parameters differ between fetuses with congenital heart disease and healthy fetuses?
Cohort (n=495)
Yes
Do automated fetal cardiac function parameters differ between fetuses with congenital heart disease and healthy fetuses?
This protocol describes a prospective cohort study to determine if automated fetal echocardiographic parameters can reliably identify cardiac dysfunction in fetuses with congenital heart disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fetal cardiac function assessment in CHD remains investigational; leaves open whether standardized parameters predict failure.
BACKGROUND: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common fetal malformation, and it can result first in cardiac remodeling and dysfunction and later in cardiac failure and hydrops. A limited number of studies have evaluated cardiac function in fetuses affected by CHD. Functional parameters could potentially identify fetuses at risk of cardiac failure before its development. However, these techniques have not translated from research to clinical settings, due to a lack of standardization and poor repeatability. We seek to evaluate whether application of automated techniques to a cohort with fetal pathology could overcome these factors. METHODS: A multicenter cohort study will be carried out in eight teaching hospitals across Europe, Australia, and Middle East. Based on a previous observed standard deviation, a total sample of 381 pregnancies is required to achieve 80% power to detect a difference of 0.03 in mean myocardial performance index (MPI) with a two-sided type I error rate of 5%. After adjustments allowing for patient exclusions or incomplete datasets, a total of 330 healthy singleton pregnancies and 165 diagnosed with CHD will be recruited. Two fetal cardiac function evaluations at 19 + 6-28 + 6 and 32 + 6-36 + 6 weeks will be offered assessing automated pulsed wave doppler (PWD) MPI, spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC) annular and septal plane excursion (TAPSE, MAPSE and SAPSE), alongside cardiac morphometric and Doppler evaluations of flow across the valves. A secondary nested case-control study will evaluate fetuses with hydrops compared to those without. Differences in functional parameters between cases and controls and over time will be assessed using generalized linear mixed models. Logistic regression will estimate the association between cardiac parameters and hydrops' incidence. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence as to whether automated functional parameters could be significantly different in pregnancy affected by CHD versus healthy pregnancies. The primary objective is to compare automated PWD-MPI and STIC TAPSE, MAPSE and SAPSE in fetuses affected by CHD versus healthy. The secondary objective is to estimate whether these automated parameters could improve the predictive value of the classical cardiovascular profile score in case of hydrops. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol has been registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System, identification number NCT05698277.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erenbourg et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Congenital heart disease (n=495). Fetal congenital heart disease vs. Healthy pregnancies was evaluated on Difference in mean automated fetal functional cardiac parameters (PWD-MPI and STIC TAPSE/MAPSE/SAPSE). This study protocol describes a planned multicenter prospective cohort study to evaluate automated fetal functional cardiac parameters in pregnancies affected by congenital heart disease; no results yet.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: