Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Garnet amphibolites beneath the Semail Ophiolite formed at 1.1 ± 0.2 GPa and greenschist-facies rocks in the same metamorphic sole yielded pressure estimates of 0.45 to 0.55 GPa. Thus, in addition to the well-known inverted thermal gradient in subophiolitic metamorphic sequences, an inverted metamorphic pressure gradient of 0.3 to 2.0 MPa/m over <2000 m also exists. Temperature estimates for samples systematically collected every 10 m across a 70 m thick sequence that contains the assemblage garnet + plagioclase + amphibole (± diopside ± ilmenite ± titanite ± rutile) allowed the determination of an average inverted metamorphic temperature gradient of 1 to 4°C/m, using different thermometers. Pressures in garnet amphibolites were estimated from the presence of cm-sized kyanite, by comparison of the observed assemblage with relevant published experimental results, and by using heterogeneous equilibrium calculations. The different estimations result in peak P-T conditions of 800 ± 100°C and 1.1 ± 0.2 GPa. The inverted metamorphic pressure gradient can be explained by the continuous accretion of material formed under different P-T conditions, although there are no obvious structural breaks in outcrop. The ≤20 km thick overlying Semail Ophiolite is insufficient to produce the computed 1.1 ± 0.2 GPa lithostatic pressures. Piling of nappes or structural thinning at the base of the nappe and continuous denudation/structural thinning at rates of 0.36 to 0.45 cm per year during emplacement may explain the inverted pressure gradient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edwin Gnos (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: