Key result
The moving-shot technique achieved a larger ablation volume compared to the fixed electrode technique at 2 minutes by preventing radiofrequency cut-off.
Why the study?
Does the moving-shot technique increase ablation volume compared to the fixed electrode technique in an ex-vivo bovine liver model?
Does the moving-shot technique increase ablation volume compared to the fixed electrode technique in an ex-vivo bovine liver model?
The moving-shot technique achieves larger ablation volumes by preventing RF cut-off compared to the fixed electrode technique in an ex-vivo bovine liver model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MST may enlarge ablation zones in liver models but should not change practice; leaves open clinical translation.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the ablation characteristics of the moving-shot technique (MST) and the fixed electrode technique (FET) for radiofrequency (RF) ablation in an ex-vivo bovine liver tissue model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed RF ablation using FET in 110 bovine liver blocks using 11 different ablation times ranging from 5 seconds to 5 minutes (10 blocks per each time duration). Ten bovine liver blocks at each ablation time of 1- or 2-minute, were ablated with MST, which treated conceptual ablation units by moving the electrode tip. We evaluated the ablation volume obtained with FET across ablation time lengths. The results of FET and MST performed with the same ablation time lengths, i.e., 1- and 2-minute ablation time were also compared. RESULTS: The ablation volume achieved with FET gradually increased with increasing ablation time; however, the pair-wise statistical comparison between 2 neighboring ablation time lengths was not significant after 30 seconds. MST with either 1- or 2-minute ablation time achieved larger ablation volumes (1.1 ± 0.2 mL vs. 2.7 ± 0.3 mL, p < 0.001; and 1.4 ± 0.2 mL vs. 5.6 ± 0.4 mL, p < 0.001, respectively), longer true RF times (46.7 ± 4.6 seconds vs. 60 seconds, p < 0.001; and 64.8 ± 4.6 seconds vs. 120 seconds, p < 0.001, respectively), fewer numbers of RF cut-offs (1.6 ± 0.5 vs. 0, p < 0.001; and 5.5 ± 0.5 vs. 0, p < 0.001, respectively), and greater energy deposition (2050.16 ± 209.2 J vs. 2677.76 ± 83.68 J, p < 0.001; and 2970.64 ± 376.56 J vs. 5564.72 ± 5439.2 J, p < 0.001, respectively), than FET. CONCLUSION: The MST can achieve a larger ablation volume by preventing RF cut-off, compared with the FET in an ex-vivo bovine liver model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ha et al. (2014) studied Ex-vivo bovine liver tissue model (n=130). Moving-shot technique vs. Fixed electrode technique was evaluated on Ablation volume at 2 minutes (mL) (p=<0.001). The moving-shot technique achieved a larger ablation volume compared to the fixed electrode technique at 2 minutes by preventing radiofrequency cut-off.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: