Key result
Oral anticoagulant-related intracranial hemorrhage had greater bleeding volume and worse prognosis than spontaneous hemorrhage, with excessive anticoagulation identified as a significant risk factor.
Why the study?
What are the risk factors and specific clinical/radiological characteristics of intracranial hemorrhage in patients receiving long-term oral anticoagulants?
Case-Control (n=418)
What are the risk factors and specific clinical/radiological characteristics of intracranial hemorrhage in patients receiving long-term oral anticoagulants?
Anticoagulant-related intracranial hemorrhage presents with larger bleeding volumes and worse prognosis compared to spontaneous ICH, highlighting the need for careful coagulation monitoring.
Supports closer INR monitoring early after initiation and after prior infarct; leaves open validation versus modern anticoagulants.
OBJECTIVE: To detect risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with long-term oral anticoagulant and to identify clinical or radiological data specific of anticoagulant-related ICH. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Three groups of patients were included. Group 1 represents patients who were admitted because of anticoagulant-related ICH between January 1984 and February 1996. All patients underwent CT scan. Clinical data, anticoagulation parameters, location and volume of the ICH, treatment and the 30-days in-hospital mortality were analyzed. Group 2 consisted of patients selected at random among all patients with spontaneous ICH admitted to our department during the same period of time. Patients without ICH, but regularly taking oral anticoagulants constituted group 3. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients with anticoagulant-related ICH were compared to 127 patients with spontaneous ICH. The volume of supratentorial ICH was greater in group 1 of patients and was correlated with a worse prognosis. Comparison of group 1 with group 3 (212 controls) demonstrated that length of anticoagulation, prothrombin time or excessive anticoagulation, prior cerebral infarct and use of acénocoumarol, but not age or indication of anticoagulant, were significant risk factors for ICH in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The results emphasize that anticoagulant-related ICH are not clinically different from spontaneous ICH except for volume of bleeding, and that frequent and careful coagulation monitoring is needed, especially during the first year in order to decrease the risk of ICH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neau et al. (2001) conducted a case-control in Intracranial hemorrhage (n=418). Oral anticoagulant treatment vs. Spontaneous ICH and no ICH was evaluated on Risk factors for ICH and clinical/radiological characteristics. Oral anticoagulant-related intracranial hemorrhage had greater bleeding volume and worse prognosis than spontaneous hemorrhage, with excessive anticoagulation identified as a significant risk factor.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: