Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Digital review platforms increasingly shape perceptions of service quality, yet their interfaces may reinforce cognitive biases. We report an AI-assisted qualitative study of 150,192 Google Maps reviews across approximately 500 healthcare and home-service locations. Combining LLM-assisted thematic synthesis with manual analysis of 1,283 reviews, we identify an urgency-quality paradox: emergency departments consistently receive lower ratings than minor injury clinics despite reviewers acknowledging superior outcomes. Mean ratings were 3.3 versus 4.0, respectively. In high-urgency contexts, evaluations focused on waiting time and responsiveness, while outcomes mattered more in lower-urgency settings. We discuss implications for reputation-system design and bias mitigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giulio Toscani (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: