Key result
Sustained essential hypertension is associated with decreased vascular compliance in men, reflecting intrinsic vascular wall alterations not consistently reversed by antihypertensive agents.
Why the study?
Does blood pressure reduction with antihypertensive agents revert decreased vascular compliance in men with sustained essential hypertension?
Does blood pressure reduction with antihypertensive agents revert decreased vascular compliance in men with sustained essential hypertension?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vascular compliance alterations in hypertension are intrinsic to the vascular wall and may not be fully reversed simply by lowering blood pressure with antihypertensive agents.
Vascular compliance is decreased in men with sustained essential hypertension. Reduced arterial compliance contributes to the maintenance of systolic pressure and end-systolic stress, thus participating in the development of cardiac hypertrophy. Reduced venous compliance contributes to maintaining the filling pressure of the heart in the presence of reduced intravascular volume. Reduced arterial and venous compliances are not the simple consequence of the elevated blood pressure but also reflect intrinsic alterations of the vascular wall. Thus, the blood pressure reduction due to antihypertensive agents is not constantly associated with a reversion of the decreased vascular compliance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laurent et al. (1987) conducted a review in Essential hypertension. Sustained essential hypertension was evaluated. Sustained essential hypertension is associated with decreased vascular compliance in men, reflecting intrinsic vascular wall alterations not consistently reversed by antihypertensive agents.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: