Key result
NIK-244 produced more potent and longer-lasting negative dromotropic effects on atrioventricular conduction compared with flecainide in isolated canine heart preparations.
Why the study?
Does the novel class Ic agent NIK-244 demonstrate more potent antiarrhythmic electrophysiological effects compared to flecainide in canine heart preparations?
Does the novel class Ic agent NIK-244 demonstrate more potent antiarrhythmic electrophysiological effects compared to flecainide in canine heart preparations?
In a canine model, the novel class Ic agent NIK-244 demonstrated more potent and longer-lasting negative dromotropic effects compared to flecainide, suggesting potential as a powerful antiarrhythmic drug.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
NIK-244's superior dromotropic potency in canines does not support clinical use; leaves open translation to human antiarrhythmic trials.
To assess the cardiovascular effects of a new class I antiarrhythmic agent, NIK-244, and to compare them with those of flecainide, canine isolated, sinoatrial node, papillary muscle and atrioventricular node preparations cross-circulated with a donor dog were used. NIK-244 injected intraarterially into the isolated preparations showed dose-related negative chronotropic, negative inotropic, and coronary vasodilator effects, which are comparable to those of flecainide, and it also showed a dose-related negative dromotropic effect on both atrio-His (AH) and His-ventricular (HV) conduction. The prolongation of AH interval by NIK-244 was significantly more potent than that by flecainide, while that of the HV interval by NIK-244 was slightly more potent, but not significantly, compared with that by flecainide. NIK-244 administered intravenously into the donor dog showed bradycardie and depressor effects in both the donor dog and the cross-circulated sinus node and papillary muscle preparations, which are comparable to the effects of flecainide. Although the negative dromotropic effects of NIK-244 on both the donor dog heart and the cross-circulated atrioventricular node preparation started more slowly, they were more potent and longer-lasting than those of flecainide. Our results suggest that NIK-244 may be a more powerful and longer-lasting antiarrhythmic agent than flecainide, since the antiarrhythmic action of class I drugs is considered to result from inhibition of the fast inward current, which is the most important depolarizing current responsible for the intraatrial and His-Purkinie-ventriclar conduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugiyama et al. (1991) studied this question. NIK-244 vs. Flecainide was evaluated on Cardiovascular effects including chronotropic, inotropic, vasodilator, and dromotropic effects. NIK-244 produced more potent and longer-lasting negative dromotropic effects on atrioventricular conduction compared with flecainide in isolated canine heart preparations.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: